library("tidyverse")
library("nycflights13")
5 R.5: Pipping and grouping
5.1 Introduction
The goal of this session is to practice combining data transformation with tidyverse
. The objectives will be to:
- Combining multiple operations with the pipe
%>%
- Work on subgroup of the data with
group_by
For this session, we are going to work with a new dataset included in the nycflights13
package.
Install this package and load it. As usual you will also need the tidyverse
library.
Solution
5.2 Combining multiple operations with the pipe
Find the 10 most delayed flights using the ranking function min_rank()
.
Solution
<- mutate(
flights_md
flights,most_delay = min_rank(desc(dep_delay))
)<- filter(flights_md, most_delay < 10)
flights_md <- arrange(flights_md, most_delay) flights_md
We don’t want to create useless intermediate variables so we can use the pipe operator: %>%
(or ctrl + shift + M
).
Behind the scenes, x %>% f(y)
turns into f(x, y)
, and x %>% f(y) %>% g(z)
turns into g(f(x, y), z)
and so on. You can use the pipe to rewrite multiple operations in a way that you can read left-to-right, top-to-bottom.
Try to pipe operators to rewrite your precedent code with only one variable assignment.
Solution
<- flights %>%
flights_md2 mutate(most_delay = min_rank(desc(dep_delay))) %>%
filter(most_delay < 10) %>%
arrange(most_delay)
Working with the pipe is one of the key criteria for belonging to the tidyverse
. The only exception is ggplot2
: it was written before the pipe was discovered and use +
instead of %>%
.
The pipe is a powerful tool, but it’s not the only tool at your disposal, and it doesn’t solve every problem! Pipes are most useful for rewriting a fairly short linear sequence of operations.
5.2.1 When not to use the pipe
You should reach for another tool when:
- Your pipes are longer than (say) ten steps. In that case, create intermediate functions with meaningful names. That will make debugging easier, because you can more easily check the intermediate results, and it makes it easier to understand your code, because the variable names can help communicate intent.
- You have multiple inputs or outputs. If there isn’t one primary object being transformed, but two or more objects being combined together, don’t use the pipe. You can create a function that combines or split the results.
5.3 Grouping variable
The summarise()
function collapses a data frame to a single row. Check the difference between summarise()
and mutate()
with the following commands:
%>%
flights mutate(delay = mean(dep_delay, na.rm = TRUE))
%>%
flights summarise(delay = mean(dep_delay, na.rm = TRUE))
Whereas mutate compute the mean
of dep_delay
row by row (which is not useful), summarise
compute the mean
of the whole dep_delay
column.
5.3.1 The power of summarise()
with group_by()
The group_by()
function changes the unit of analysis from the complete dataset to individual groups. Individual groups are defined by categorical variable or factors. Then, when you use aggregation functions on the grouped data frame, they’ll be automatically applied by groups.
You can use the following code to compute the average delay per months across years.
<- flights %>%
flights_delay group_by(year, month) %>%
summarise(delay = mean(dep_delay, na.rm = TRUE), sd = sd(dep_delay, na.rm = TRUE)) %>%
arrange(month)
`summarise()` has grouped output by 'year'. You can override using the
`.groups` argument.
ggplot(data = flights_delay, mapping = aes(x = month, y = delay)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity", color = "black", fill = "#619CFF") +
geom_errorbar(mapping = aes(ymin = 0, ymax = delay + sd)) +
theme(axis.text.x = element_blank())
Why did we group_by
year
and month
and not only year
?
5.3.2 Missing values
You may have wondered about the na.rm
argument we used above. What happens if we don’t set it?
%>%
flights group_by(dest) %>%
summarise(
dist = mean(distance),
delay = mean(arr_delay)
)
# A tibble: 105 × 3
dest dist delay
<chr> <dbl> <dbl>
1 ABQ 1826 4.38
2 ACK 199 NA
3 ALB 143 NA
4 ANC 3370 -2.5
5 ATL 757. NA
6 AUS 1514. NA
7 AVL 584. NA
8 BDL 116 NA
9 BGR 378 NA
10 BHM 866. NA
# ℹ 95 more rows
Aggregation functions obey the usual rule of missing values: if there’s any missing value in the input, the output will be a missing value.
5.3.3 Counts
Whenever you do any aggregation, it’s always a good idea to include a count (n()
). This way, you can check that you’re not drawing conclusions based on very small amounts of data.
Imagine that we want to explore the relationship between the average distance (distance
) and average delay (arr_delay
) for each location (dest
) and recreate the above figure.
Hints Here are the steps to prepare those data:
- Group flights by destination.
- Summarize to compute average distance (
avg_distance
), average delay (avg_delay
), and number of flights usingn()
(n_flights
). - Filter to remove Honolulu airport (“HNL”), which is almost twice as far away as the next closest airport.
- Filter to remove noisy points with delay superior to 40 or inferior to -20
- Create a
mapping
onavg_distance
,avg_delay
andn_flights
assize
. - Use the layer
geom_point()
andgeom_smooth()
(use method = lm) - We can hide the legend with the layer
theme(legend.position='none')
Solution
%>%
flights group_by(dest) %>%
summarise(
n_flights = n(),
avg_distance = mean(distance, na.rm = TRUE),
avg_delay = mean(arr_delay, na.rm = TRUE)
%>%
) filter(dest != "HNL") %>%
filter(avg_delay < 40 & avg_delay > -20) %>%
ggplot(mapping = aes(x = avg_distance, y = avg_delay, size = n_flights)) +
geom_point() +
geom_smooth(method = lm, se = FALSE) +
theme(legend.position = "none")
5.3.4 Ungrouping
If you need to remove grouping, and return to operations on ungrouped data, use ungroup()
.
Try the following example.
%>%
flights group_by(year, month, day) %>%
ungroup() %>%
summarise(delay = mean(dep_delay, na.rm = TRUE))
# A tibble: 1 × 1
delay
<dbl>
1 12.6
5.4 Grouping challenges
5.4.1 First challenge
Look at the number of canceled flights per day. Is there a pattern?
(A canceled flight is a flight where either the dep_time
or the arr_time
is NA
)
Remember to always try to decompose complex questions into smaller and simple problems
- How can you create a
canceled
flights variable which will be TRUE if the flight is canceled or FALSE if not? - We need to define the day of the week
wday
variable (Monday, Tuesday, …). To do that, you can usestrftime(x,'%A')
to get the name of the day of ax
date in the POSIXct format as in thetime_hour
column, ex:strftime("2013-01-01 05:00:00 EST",'%A')
return “Tuesday” ). - We can count the number of canceled flight (
cancel_day
) by day of the week (wday
). - We can pipe transformed and filtered tibble into a
ggplot
function. - We can use
geom_col
to have a barplot of the number ofcancel_day
for each.wday
- You can use the function
fct_reorder()
to reorder thewday
by number ofcancel_day
and make the plot easier to read.
Solution
%>%
flights mutate(
canceled = is.na(dep_time) | is.na(arr_time)
%>%
) filter(canceled) %>%
mutate(wday = strftime(time_hour, "%A")) %>%
group_by(wday) %>%
summarise(
cancel_day = n()
%>%
) ggplot(mapping = aes(x = fct_reorder(wday, cancel_day), y = cancel_day)) +
geom_col()
5.4.2 Second challenge
Is the proportion of canceled flights by day of the week related to the average departure delay?
Solution
%>%
flights mutate(
canceled = is.na(dep_time) | is.na(arr_time)
%>%
) mutate(wday = strftime(time_hour, "%A")) %>%
group_by(wday) %>%
summarise(
prop_cancel_day = sum(canceled) / n(),
av_delay = mean(dep_delay, na.rm = TRUE)
%>%
) ungroup() %>%
ggplot(mapping = aes(x = av_delay, y = prop_cancel_day, color = wday)) +
geom_point()
We can add error bars to this plot to justify our decision. Brainstorm a way to construct the error bars.
Hints:
- We can define the error bars with confidence intervals.
cancel_day
can be modeled as a Bernoulli random variable: \(X \sim \mathcal{B}(p)\).
The corresponding \(\alpha=5\%\) two-sided confidence interval is defined by: \[ \left[ \ \hat{p} \pm q_{1-\frac{\alpha}{2}} \sqrt{\dfrac{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p})}{n}} \ \right] \]dep_delay
can be modeled as a Gaussian random variable: \(X \sim \mathcal{N}(\mu, \sigma^2)\).
The corresponding \(\alpha=5\%\) two-sided confidence interval is defined by: \[ \left[ \ \hat{\mu} \pm t_{1-\frac{\alpha}{2}, n-1} \frac{\hat{\sigma}}{\sqrt{n}} \ \right] \]- We can draw error bars with the functions
geom_errorbar
andgeom_errorbarh
.
Solution
<- 0.05
alpha %>%
flights mutate(
canceled = is.na(dep_time) | is.na(arr_time),
wday = strftime(time_hour, "%A")
%>%
) group_by(wday) %>%
summarize(
n_obs = n(),
prop_cancel_day = sum(canceled) / n_obs,
sd_cancel_day = sqrt(prop_cancel_day * (1 - prop_cancel_day)),
av_delay = mean(dep_delay, na.rm = T),
sd_delay = sd(dep_delay, na.rm = T)
%>%
) ggplot(mapping = aes(x = av_delay, y = prop_cancel_day, color = wday)) +
geom_point() +
geom_errorbarh(
mapping = aes(
xmin = av_delay - qt(1 - alpha / 2, n_obs - 1) * sd_delay / sqrt(n_obs),
xmax = av_delay + qt(1 - alpha / 2, n_obs - 1) * sd_delay / sqrt(n_obs)
)+
) geom_errorbar(
mapping = aes(
ymin = prop_cancel_day - qnorm(1 - alpha / 2) * sd_cancel_day / sqrt(n_obs),
ymax = prop_cancel_day + qnorm(1 - alpha / 2) * sd_cancel_day / sqrt(n_obs)
)+
) theme_linedraw()
Now that you are aware of the interest of using geom_errorbar
, what hour
of the day should you fly if you want to avoid delays as much as possible?
Solution
%>%
flights group_by(hour) %>%
summarise(
mean_delay = mean(arr_delay, na.rm = T),
sd_delay = sd(arr_delay, na.rm = T),
%>%
) ggplot() +
geom_errorbar(
mapping = aes(
x = hour,
ymax = mean_delay + sd_delay,
ymin = mean_delay - sd_delay
)+
) geom_point(
mapping = aes(
x = hour,
y = mean_delay,
) )
5.4.3 Third challenge
Which carrier has the worst delays?
Solution
%>%
flights group_by(carrier) %>%
summarise(
carrier_delay = mean(arr_delay, na.rm = T)
%>%
) mutate(carrier = fct_reorder(carrier, carrier_delay, .na_rm = T)) %>%
ggplot(mapping = aes(x = carrier, y = carrier_delay)) +
geom_col(alpha = 0.5)
Can you disentangle the effects of bad airports vs. bad carriers?
Hints:
- Think about
group_by(carrier, dest)
. - We can color points per airport destination with the function
geom_jitter
. - We can label points per airport destination with the function
geom_text_repel
from packageggrepel
. - We can control the jitter randomness with the function
position_jitter
.
Solution
require(ggrepel)
%>%
flights group_by(carrier, dest) %>%
summarise(
carrier_delay = mean(arr_delay, na.rm = T),
nflight = n()
%>%
) ungroup() %>%
mutate(carrier = fct_reorder(carrier, carrier_delay, .na_rm = T)) %>%
ggplot(mapping = aes(x = carrier, y = carrier_delay)) +
geom_boxplot(outlier.shape = NA) +
geom_jitter(
aes(color = dest), # color points per destination
position = position_jitter(
width = 0.2, # small horizontal jitter
height = 0, # no vertical jitter
seed = 1 # to be reproducible
),show.legend = FALSE # remove legend
+
) geom_text_repel(
aes(label = dest, color = dest), # color label per destination
max.overlaps = 10, # allow more labels to be drawn
position = position_jitter(
width = 0.2,
height = 0,
seed = 1
),show.legend = FALSE
+
) theme_linedraw()
See you in R.6: tidydata
License: FIXME.
Made with Quarto.